CONFUSION IN CAIRO

The people of Egypt, drawing inspiration from what is popularly known as the “Orange Revolution’ in Tunisia has ousted the authoritarian regime of Hosni Mubarak. Cairo has been liberated from its dictator of thirty years. Though the whereabouts of the former President is not clear, people have begun to disperse from the Tahrir Square after nineteen days of unprecedented protest.
The military has dissolved the present parliament and suspended the Constitution The Military Council of Egypt’s military has taken over the administration for the time being declaring that it will rule the country until elections are held and a civilian democratic government takes over. It is reported that election would be held in September. Let’s wait and watch the developments.
Prime Minister Ahmed Shafiq said that the government’s priority is to restore peace and normalcy in the country. “We need to bring back a sense of security to the Egyptian citizen” he said.
Mohamed ElBaradei, who was with the International Atomic Agency till recently is the prominent person who encouraged people to protest. However he has not been able to rise to the occasion and lead the people. He is often described these days as the releuctant revolutionary. On 28th January he offered his prayers out side the mosque in Cairo and dared the water cannons of the riot police.
All the parties in the country have great responsibilities in the coming days. If they are not able to forge some sort of alliances and form a responsible government the country could slip into chaos.

AARUSHI MURDER MYSTERY

The CBI, the chief investigation agency in India on 29 December 2010, proposed to wind up the Aarushi murder case, as it had not been able to gather enough evidence to identify the murderer.
The CBI did not even inform Aarushi’s parents of its proposal. Aarushi’s father, Dr. Rajesh Talwar,is reported to have said to the pressmen that “"I got to know of it from the media. And, there has been no communication from the agency”. "We had pinned our hopes on the investigation but it's been shattered.” he added.
Fourteen years old, eighth standard girl, named Aarushi was found lying dead on her bed at her home in Noida on 15-May-2008. She had been murdered. Her throat had been slit open. And there were stab marks on her face. Later Hansraj, the servant at her house was also found dead on the roof the next day. Earlier Noida police had suspected his involvement in the murder. Aarushi was the only child of dentist Dr. Rajesh Talwar and Mrs. Nupur Talwar.
Police arrested Dr. Rajesh and kept behind the bars for about two months. Then he was released saying that there was no evidence against him. At the initial stages of the investigation, the Noida police was accused of cocking up evidences and wiping out existing clues. Many stories about Aarushi that did the rounds in those days were obscene to say the least.
On 1 June 2008 the CBI took up the case. A former CBI official was reported to have claimed that there was enough evidence to bring the culprits to justice. Though everyone including her parents hoped that the CBI would solve the mystery surrounding the case nothing happened. The CBI had arrested Krishna, his medical assistant and two other servants named Raj Kumar and Vijay Mandal. But soon they were also released for lack of evidence.
Though nobody knew what actually happened it was reported that evidences had been tampered with by some powerful hands. Aarushi’s vaginal swabs had been substituted with others. And the pathology reports went missing. How did all this happen without the knowledge of the police is a question that has not been answered yet. The Noida police had meanwhile recovered Aarushi’s black Nokia N72 mobile phone from Bulandshahr in Utter Pradesh.
The Ghaziabad court In January 2010 allowed the CBI to subject Aarushi’s parents to narco analysis tests. They underwent the test at a laboratory in Ahmedabad in February. Nothing emerged from it either.
Legal experts are divided over the CBI move. Santhi Bhushan termed it as ‘a failure of the CBI’. Prominent lawyer Lekhi said that some powerful hands present at the site of murder are trying to cover up the case. She said, “We all know how the CBI is used and misused”.
Let us hope that the Ghaziabad court asks the CBI to reinvestigate the case and bring the culprits to justice.

THE SECOND ANNIVERSARY OF MUMBAI CARNAGE

India on 26-11-2010, remembered those who fell prey to the terrorist’s bullets at Mumbai on 26-11-2008. Twenty six foreign nationals were killed in the attack. Nine militants killed belonged to the Lashkar-e-Taiba, a terrorist group based in Pakistan. Sixteen Indian security personnel had also been killed in the operation to flush out the terrorists who had holed up in the Taj Hotel holding many as hostage. When the carnage ended after three days one hundred and sixty six persons had lost their lives. Evidence gathered pointed to the involvement of Pakistan’s ISI.
The Rajya Sabha and the Lok Sabha observed a minutes silence in memory of the people killed in the attack.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said in New Delhi, “Two years ago this day Mumbai was subjected to a brutal terrorist attack the claimed the lives of hundreds of innocent people. The nation joins the bereaved families in remembering and mourning those who perished in this barbaric attack”. He also assured the nation that the government would double its efforts to bring the perpetrators of the inhuman crime against humanity to justice.
Union Home Mister Mr. P. Chidambaram laid a wreath at the martyr’s memorial at Police Gymghana at Mumbai. He said, “I sincerely hope that on the second anniversary of this horrific tragedy Pakistan will realize its responsibility as a nation as a government and fulfill its promised to bring to justice those who perpetrated the attacks”. The Minister also praised the bravery of Mr. Tukaram Ombale, the police man who was killed when he held Ajmal Kasab, the only terrorist we were able to catch alive.
It may be recalled that it was the unarmed policeman Mr. Tukaram, who tried to stop the car carrying two of the terrorists. One was at the wheel and Kasab was sitting with his gun. Kasab got out of the car and fired at Tukaram killing him instantly. However, the brave policeman held on to Kasab and his colleagues overpowered him. Had Tukaram not stopped Kasab we would not have had the ‘living proof’ of the crime.
Chidambaram handed over the dealership of a CNG filling station at suburban Borivali to Tukaram’s family.
Prithviraj Chavan the Chief Minister of Maharastra speaking at the Gandhi Bhavan, said, “Innocent lives were lost. But damage was contained due to the bravery of our soldiers and police officers. We are indebted to them and their family members. It was because of the sacrifice of one of our police official that one of the terrorist was caught alive”.
The members of the family of the slain police officials were also there in Mumbai on the occasion.
Birendra Singh, brother of the slain NSG commando Mr. Gajendra Singh, said, “I have seen that solemn remembrances are being organized in Mumbai and other places which are essential to remember and keep alive the memory of martyrs and their contribution to the country”
Father of another NSG commando Major Sandeep Unnikrishnan, who had been killed by the terrorists at the Taj, cycled to Mumbai from Delhi in commemoration of his son’s bravery. Unnikrishnan participated in the peace march from the Nariman Point to the Gateway of India and released white balloons. The 62 year-old father proudly said, “The terrorists could kill only our body and not our soul. I have lost my only son but I am proud that he has given life for the country”.
About Ajaml Kasab he said, “Last year when I was in Mumbai I said that Kasab should die. This year I feel we must let Kasab live because it will strengthen our resolve to fight terrorism”.
Unnikrishnan and his wife Dhanalakshmi paid their tributes to the martyrs of the terror attack at the Chabad House.
Rabbi Nachman, father of Rabbi Gavriel who was killed at Chadad House, the Jewish centre, had this to say about Unnikrishnan, “Though it is a tragedy for the family that they have lost their son, one must not forget that Major Unnikrishnan sacrificed his life to save the lives of several people”.
Twenty surgeons of Bombay Hospital, who treated many of the injured in the shoot out launched a Terror Form on Friday
Hillary Clinton, The US Secretary of state observed “As the people of Mumbai gather in temples, mosques, churches, gurudwaras and synagogues to honour those who perished on November 26,2008,they send a message of resolve, resilience and mutual respect that is far louder and more powerful than any terrorist’s guns”.
Mr. S.M. Krishna, India’s foreign minister who is Sri Lanka was reported to have said, “Once again I call upon Pakistan to dismantle the terror machine operasting with impunity in territories under its (Pakistan’s) control and bring to all the perpetrators of the Mumbai terror attacks to speedy justice”.
On Thursday, India issued a note to the Pakistan Embassy expressing disappointment and “lack of progress” in the trial of seven terrorists arrested in Pakistan. India also urged Pakistan to “fulfill its obligations and commitment”
Meanwhile Pakistan on Friday expressed its determination to bring the perpetrators of the attack to justice soon. Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Pak Foreign Minister was reported to have said “It is our desire to punish those people who are involved in this”. He also said Pakistan was co-operating with India in the investigations.
However, nothing concrete has happened to bring the culprits to justice. Kasab the lone terrorist nabbed and kept in the prison has narrated their journey from Pakistan to India in graphic detail. “Kubeer”, the trawler that the terrorists hijacked to come to Mumbai is there at Porbandar for everyone to see.
Immediately after the attack Pakistan had washed its hands off the carnage saying that it had noting to do with it. It even rejected the claim of Kasab that he was a Pakistani national. However, his father identified Kasab when his photos appeared in the press.
The West also expressed its concern and extended support to India. The US sent its FBI to assist India to gather evidence .Everything has pointed to the involvement of the Pakistani terrorists groups.
India has handed over many dossiers to Pakistan. But Pakistan’s Foreign Minister termed them as “mere literature not evidence”.
Now that the Americans are pressing Pakistan to take actions against the perpetrators let us hope that Pakistan would take some concert steps to bring the culprits to justice.

AUNG SAN SUU KYI IS FREE

After spending fifteen years under detention Aung San Suu Kyi walked free on 13-11-2010 to the cheering crowd. Presence of police in large numbers around her house for a couple of days had led to the speculation that the military Junta would release her. Thousands of her supporters had been camping outside her house in Yangon since Friday. As she walked towards the crowd, some one from the crowd shouted “She will save the country”. “I love her very much” shouted another one.
It shows that Su Kyi still remains very popular among the people though there had not been any direct contact between Su Kyi and the people. "I have to give you the first political lesson since my release. We haven't seen each other for so long, so we have many things to talk about”, said Suu Kyi to the people. The military personnel present there did not try to restrain the people indicating that times have changed.
The Junta’s Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) had won the national election held on 7 -11-2010. More than two-thirds of the contestants belonged to the Union Solidarity and Development Party of the Junta. And many of them served the army till recently. International observers had severely criticized the election.
Myanmar had been under military rule since 1962. The Junta had arrested Suu Kyi who had won the national election in 1990.It is believed that the Junta released her in the hope that the international community would accept the election result.
Many world leaders expressed happiness at her release. Surin Pitsuswan, the head of The Association of Southeast Asian Nations of which Myanmar happens to be a member, expressing his relief said that her release “would contribute to true national reconciliation”.
Mr. David Cameron, the British Prime Minister, said “Aung San Suu Kyi is an inspiration for all of us who believe in freedom of speech,democeacy and human rights”.
The US President Mr. Barack Obama hailed her saying the Suu Kyi was a “hero of mine”. “The United States welcomes her long overdue release”, Mr. Obama said in a statement released immediately after her release.He said Suu Kyi was an inspiration for all who wanted to uphold human rights all over the world.
Former President of the US Mr. Bill Clinton said: “this signals a new direction for the country’s relations with others beyond their borders”.
Mr. Ban Ki-moon, the Secretary General of the United Nations, wished Suu Kyii the best and said “Her dignity and courage in the face of injustice have been an inspiration to many people around the world”. Both Mr. Ki-mmon and Mr. Clinton urged the military to release al other political prisoners believed to be around 2000.
Jimmy Carter another former President of the United States said, “Burma’s neighbour’s, especially China and India, have a great deal of interest in stability in the region. He expressed the hope that China and India would encourage the military to hold talks with the opposition parties.
Aung San Suu and her two maids, Kyi Khin Khin Win and Win Ma Ma,who happens to be mother and daughter lived a quite life in her 90 years old mansion. She used to meet her lawyer and her close friend U Nyan Win at times. Her family doctor was allowed to visit her once a month. She spent her time during the detention reading books such as biographies, novels and books on philosophy. She also used to read ‘Time’ and ‘Newsweek’ regularly.
She had no access to Telephone, Television and Internet. However, she was allowed to keep five radios with her. And she listened to the BBC, The Voice of America and the Democratic News Service of Burma.
What will happen in Burma now that “The Lady” has been released is anybody’s guess.

IRAN'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS AND WESTERN DILEMMA

As far as Iran is concerned America is the Satan. And it is out do the god-fearing, innocent people of Iran in by the hooks and the crooks. Iran claims as it has been growing fast its energy needs has also been on the rise. To meet the increasing demands it has to harness the nuclear fuels. But the western countries are not convinced. They fear that a nuclear Iran could lead to large scale nuclear proliferation and it would pose a greater threat to world peace.
All the same Iran has shown signs of some sort of compromise. Iran has agreed to send the Uranium it has to Turkey. Though many countries including China welcomed the new initiative the Americans have hardened their positions and have made it clear the new move is not satisfactory enough.
American President Obama has called for more coordination among the nations of the world and tough steps to stop Iran pursuing its nuclear ambitions. He has also urged the UN to impose sanctions on Iran for its defiance.
French President Sarkozy after a meeting with Obama at the White House said that Iran must not be allowed to carry on its ‘mad race’. It is high time the UN imposed sanctions on Iran he added. The European nations would stand united behind the sanction Sarkozy declared in a voice that exuded confidence.
The G8 Foreign Ministers have also called for stepping up pressure on Iran to give up its ambitious nuclear program.
Earlier Iran had agreed to a deal proposed by the IAEA. Iran’s claim is that it needs Uranium enriched up to 20 percent, to make medical isotopes to be used in the treatment of Cancer. According to the plan Iran is to send lightly enriched Uranium to Russia which will enrich it to 20 percent. Russia will send the enriched Uranium to France which will convert it into fuel rods and send it back to Iran. Uranium enriched up to 20 percent can be used to make bombs. Once it is converted into fuel rods it cannot be used to make bombs.
Iran now says that it is going ahead with its plan to enrich Uranium up to 20 percent on its own. On 11 February Iranian President Ahmadinejad claimed that Iran had already enriched uranium up to 20 percent successfully. He went on to claim that his country has developed techniques to enrich Uranium up to 80 percent, should the need arouse. However, as of now Iran does not require Uranium enriched to such high degree he added.
Although these developments have caused much disquiet in the West, they have not been able to come up with concrete steps to stop Iran. Now that Sarkozy has also voiced his concern in strong words and called for immediate action against Iran, some stern actions can be expected in the coming days. The US may be able to bring Russia round. But nothing can be said with any degree of certainty how China would react.
Earlier China had opposed moves to impose sanctions on Iran. On 5 February Chinese Foreign minister was reported to have said “the parties concerned should with the over-all and long-tern interests in mind step up diplomatic efforts, stay patient and adopt a more flexible pragmatic and proactive policy”.
Will the Americans be able to win China over to their side is to be seen.

PARLIMENTARY ELECTIONS IN SRI LANKA

Having won all the elections, the Council Elections, the Presidential Election and the General Election Rajapaksa, the President of Sri Lanka can feel safe and secure. Having failed to win the confidence of the people the opposition has brought discredit upon itself. Indeed the voter turn out reported to be around 54%, was all time low. All the same it does not belittle Rajapaksa’s victory. His party, United People’s Freedom Alliance, a group of ten parties, bagged 143 seats out of 225 in the election held almost a year after the Lankan army put the LTTE to rout. LTTE believed to be the well organized militant group in the world was defeated and its leader Prabhakaran was killed in a fierce battle by the Lankan army. The LTTE is said to have had an Air force and Navy of its own.
Neither the United National Party (UNP) led by the former Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe nor Democratic National Alliance (DNA), led by the retired General Sarath Fonseka, one of the main architects of the military victory of the Lankan army over LTTE, could not win the confidence of the people.
The pro-LTTE, Tamil National Alliance (TNA) managed to bag 16 seats six seats less than what it had in the last assembly.
Having tasted military as well as electoral victory, President Rajapaksa described his party’s electoral victory as an endorsement of his policies and a rejection of the allegations against his government. Agencies reported Rajapaksa as having said, “The assured majority in Parliament given by the votes encourages the government to proceed with its policies for the strengthening of peace and reconciliation, reconstruction, greater infrastructure development, increased investment in identified areas of growth”.
Rajapaksa needs the support of just seven members for a two-thirds majority in the parliament. Anyone who has been watching Rajapaksa knows that winning the support of seven legislators is child’s play for the shrewd politician that he is.
According to Ranil Wikremesinghe, however, the results are not an endorsement of the government policies. He is reported to have said that the fact that the percentage of the people who did not turn out for the voting was about forty eight was an indication of the people’s indignation at the government’s policies. All the same, he has not been able to explain his party’s dismal performance.
Now that the President has all the power he needs at his disposal he must in all earnestness take the initiate to solve the decades old ethnic problems of the island. Though the LTTE has been wiped out, the causes that gave rise to the LTTE have not been addressed as yet. Rajapaksa’s contention till now has been that a constitutional amendment, for which a two-thirds majority is needed, is necessary to solve the ethnic problem. Now that he has in his hands as it were what he lacked, he must move fast. Other he will lose faith that the people reposed in him.
Let’s hope that Rajapaksa will employ the mandate he has been given judiciously. Let’s us all who want to see a peaceful solution to the Tamil ethnic problem hope that it will emerge soon.

INDO-RUSSIAN RELATIONSHIP

Indo-Russian relationship has stood the test of time. Russia has always stood by India in the International forums. Even the collapse of the USSR has not dented the relationship in anyway. Russia had even offered to hand over the technical know-how of the cryogenic engine to India. Unfortunately succumbing to the US pressure Russia later withdrew from its earlier stand.

The Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh signed many agreements when Putin visited India in early March this year. They are expected to strengthen the bilateral relationship between the two countries further.

At a time when the nuclear energy is expected to meet the ever increasing energy needs in India Russia has promised to build a nuclear reactor at Haripur in West Bengal and two at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu within the next ten years. The Russians has reportedly told India that they could build 10 to 12 nuclear reactors in India in no time. This assurance has helped India to heave a sigh of relief.

Sergei Ivanov, the Russian Deputy Prime Minister said that his country had promised India that it would build “16 nuclear energy units” in India. Both the countries have also agreed to cooperate more in the exploration of gas and oil as well. It could lead to an over all surge in the bilateral trade between the counties.

The defense deals India signed with the US, Israel and other counties had made Russia anxious. Manmohan Singh sought to ally the Russian anxiety by saying that they “had finalized several important and long-pending defense cooperation projects”. Putin on his part assured India that it would keep the interests of India in mind and would not have any defense deals with Pakistan.

Not to be outdone by other countries especially the US, Russian have expressed their readiness to produce its fifth generation fighter as a joint venture with India. India is reported to have conveyed its readiness to Russia. If both the countries are able to work out the details it would be the second joint venture by India and Russia after the BrahMos cruise missile.

Though there is no denying the fact that this news is heartening to India, India should not hasten to sign agreements with Russia. Unavailability of spare parts has always caused much heartburning in India. We must before signing any agreements get an assurance from Russia as to the availability of the spares. This is important in the context of the Russian ambassador’s own admission that even Russia has problems getting spares for its own use. Many of the factories that make the spare parts are located in former Soviet Republics.

India and Russia have also settled the disputes about the cost of the submarine Admiral Gorshkov. It was in 2004 that India decided to buy the submarine from Russia. The agreed price was $974 million. However, as Russia took time to restructure it according to the needs of India the price also kept soaring. Now both the countries have arrived at a price of $2.3billion

Let us hope that the time-tested relationship between the countries will become stronger in the coming days.

MYANMAR ELECTION 2010

The 64 year old elegant lady Aung San Suu kyi has been under house arrest for about fourteen years now. By all appearances it seems that the military Junta has no intention of releasing her in the near future. They know well that if she is released now, it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to put her behind the bars again. Given the nature of the military regime it would prolong her detention as much as possible under one pretext or another.

What surprises me is the silence of India and America described as the largest and greatest democracies of the world in the face of the inhuman treatment the military in Myanmar meets out to Suu kyi. Even the UN apart from the accessional lip service, has not been able to do something concrete about it. The various Human rights organizations are so preoccupied with defending the rights of terrorists that they have no time and energy to make the Myanmar military regime see that Suu Kyi deserves better treatment.

Last year as she was about to be released from her house arrest an American national Than Swe by name swam across a lake to meet Suu Kyi. The military court sentenced her to undergo three years imprisonment. However, it was commuted to 18 months imprisonment. The US national was allowed to go home. The whole world knew that the Junta was trying to stop her from contesting the national election.

Recently the Junta introduced new electoral legislations. It does not require any analysis to see that they were enacted to offset the efforts of the opposition to unseat it. As per the new rule a party to be eligible to participate in the election must get itself registered. In case of failure it will be dismantled. And the party should not allow a member who has served a prison term to continue as its member. In other words Suu Kyi cannot be a member of her party. According to the law the NLD has to expel Suu Kyi. A spokesman of NLD, Nyan Win told AFP “I have noticed that we have to expel Daw Suu (Suu Kyi)”. “I did not think it would be so bad”. He added.

The NLD has decided not to register. Nyan Win, Suu Kyi’s lawyer is reported to have said, “If we register it would mean the NLD is everything the Junta asks it to do. The NLD is working for free democracy”.

Aung Din of the ‘US Campaign for Burma’ said, “Now the ball is in the court of the UN , USA and the international community who have repeatedly calling for the regime to make an inclusive, free and fair election”.

Meanwhile Tomas Ojea Quintana, the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights is Myanmar has said that the UN Security Council should think about setting up an inquiry committee “with a specific fact-finding mandate to address the question of international crimes”. He has charged the Military regime with gross human rights violation.

As part of its game plan the Junta has allowed the NLD to reopen its regional offices that have remained closed since 2003. Let us hope that the fact that the junta is trying to create an impression of being liberal will not be lost on the world leaders.

IS DEMOCRACY UNSUITABLE FOR NEPAL?

Former Prime Minister of Nepal Krishna Prasad Bhattarai is reported to have said that Nepal is not ripe for federalism and republicanism. He has also reportedly called for a revival of constitutional monarchy which he claims to be the best form of government for Nepal.

According to Bhattarai, one of the founding leaders of the Nepali Congress no form of government can be imposed on a society. He is reported to have said “Federalism, secularism and republican system are imported from outside and are not suitable for Nepal. They have been brought in a hurry and are against Nepal’s genuine identity and need”.

However, Bimalendra Nidhi, the general secretary of the party has disassociating from the comment said that it is not the official view of the party. Saying that “We don’t buy his ideas”, Nidhi said that Bhattarai was not active in politics.

The 1990 Constitution had guaranteed Constitutional Monarchy. The Maoists wanted a new constitution for Nepal. It was removed in 2008 to enable the Maoists to join the political mainstream and contest election. However, the government headed by the Maoist leader Prachanda could not rule Nepal for long as it was on a collision course with the president since its inception. Many of Prachanda’s action as the Prime Minister of Nepal had irked India. Especially his visit to China after assuming office annoyed the Indian policy makers. Traditionally the Nepali Prime Minister used to visit India after being sworn in. There were no takers for his argument that he visited China first to take part in the opening g ceremony of the Olympics.

The question can democracy or any other form of government be transplanted to a country is a much debated one. The Americans have been striving to democratize the world. Earlier the USSR since the time of Lenin and Stalin sought to make all countries in the world Communist. Lenin even believed that three fourths of the world would have been converted to Communism by the end of the 20th century. The break up of the USSR and the collapse of the Berlin Wall in Germany proved it to have been a delusion.

To my mind the argument that democracy does not suit Nepal or any other country for that matter does not make any sense at all. A closer examination revels that all the democratic countries have defects of various kinds. None is perfect. It cannot be. The American, the British and the Indian versions of democracies can be faulted on many counts. Democracy took roots in these countries slowly and gradually. The most important point to be kept in mind is that these countries had great leaders and statesmen with the conviction that democracy was the best option around. All of them knew well that democratic principles could be distorted easily. And it could even ruin a country if the institutions failed to function well.

As I see it, building institutions and ensuring that they function well are very important. Only leaders with vision and conviction can guarantee it. Unfortunately Nepal lacks leaders with vision and conviction. Though the Koiralas, in their fight against the British and the Ranas, were inspired by the Indian struggle for freedom and the leadership of Gandhiji and Nehru, they failed to build and mould democratic institutions in Nepal. The monarchy, the brief spells of democracy and the Maoist rule have made the Nepalese cynical.

Bhattarai says that democracy cannot be imposed on Nepal. True. The very word ‘impose’ itself is against the spirit of democracy. The seeds of democracy are to be sowed first. And the young plants, the democratic institutions, are to be guarded against the attacks of pests of various kinds.

I do not subscribe to his view that democracy does not suit Nepal or any other country for that matter. At present democracy seems to be the best form of government around for us despite its many defects.

TALK WITH THE TALIBAN?

 In Afghanistan and elsewhere all are in a hurry these days. What with the large scale destruction and displacement the people of Afghanistan are desperate and disappointed. Obama is now more anxious to find a way to get out of Afghanistan. Last week in a fit of anger Karzai, the Afghan president said that he would join the Taliban unless the American helped him. Slowly and gradually it has dawned on everyone concerned with Afghanistan that it is not easy if not impossible to defeat the Taliban. Another point that is not to the liking of many is the realization that there cannot be a long lasting settlement without the participation of the Taliban.

The goal of the present military operation in Afghanistan is to strengthen the bargaining power of the of the Karzai government vis a vis the Taliban at the negotiation table and produce what they describe as ‘reasonable outcomes’. All the same no one seems to have a clue about the ‘reasonable outcome” or what could be ‘reasonable’.

Britain also wants the Afghan administration to speed up the political process and reach a settlement as early as possible. The Germans that has had to face the ire of the Afghan people recently for attacks on the civilians want to get out of the quick sand early.

Meanwhile Karzai has planned to convene a meeting of the innumerable tribal leaders. Karzai is a member of the Peshthun ethnic group. Most of the Taliban fighters also belong to this group. No wonder the president addresses the militants as ‘our disenchanted brothers’. The president and the army find it increasingly difficult to carry on the fighting against their ‘brothers’. There are even reports that the government has established contacts with the militants. However, the opposition believes that it is impossible to accommodate the Taliban in the future scheme of things.

The Americans are a worried lot. They are in a double bind. If negotiations with the Taliban would help Karzai to widen his support base and persuade the Taliban to lay down arms they would not oppose it. At the same time they do not trust Karzai much. What if Karzai failed (or refused) to disarm the Taliban?

Many questions pop in the mind of those who observe the developments in Afghanistan. Are the groups of Taliban described as ‘sane’ and ‘good’ are really sane and good? Can they ensure the safety of the people and the region? What if the ‘insane’ and ‘bad’ Taliban overpowered the ‘sane’ and ‘good’?

KANU SANYAL

With the suicide of Kanu Sanyal an era has come to an end.

When Kanu Sanyal, Charu Mazumdar and others founded the Naxal Movement in the late sixties they had a lofty goal. A society sans class and hence a society sans exploitation. A society where honey and milk flowed like water. Marx had said that what he was trying to do was to bring the heaven from the sky down to the earth. He could not do it before he died. The Naxals thought that they were destined to do precisely that.

It was on 23 April 1969 Sanyal, Mazumdar and their close associates formed the CPI (ML) [Communist Party of India- Marxist-Leninist]. It was on1st May 1969 they announced the formation of the party. When the left in Bengal joined hands with the Congress accepting Parliamentary Democracy and rejecting an eternal struggle against it, Sanyal and a handful of loyal friends felt that it was a betrayal of the toiling masses. They thought that the part supposed to liberate the people from the clutches of the capitalist wolves was sacrificing their revolutionary struggle for crumbs of power.

On 2 March 1967 a tribal youth with he permission of the judiciary went to his field. In no time he was stopped by the thugs of the landlord. The tribal also joined hands a fight followed. A policeman was killed. The next day the police retaliated and fired killing many. However the police failed to control the agitated peasants. They forcibly occupied the lands of the landlords who had to flee for their life. It was led by Charu Mazumdar.

It was the armed uprising of the peasants on 25 May 1967 in a small village called Naxalbari in North Bengal that grew into the dreaded Naxal Movement. In the late sixties and late seventies the movement sent shivers the spines of rich and powerful gentry. Wayanad and Palghat in Kerala were also the hot hubs of the Naxal Movement.

Soon differences cropped up between Sanyal and Mazumdar. They were poles apart on the question of use of violence to achieve their goal. Mazumdar believed that there cannot be a revolution till the class enemies are eliminated with force. Mazumdar’s line of thinking did not impress Sanyal much. He felt that killing ordinary policemen accusing them of being the agents of the class enemy would not lead to revolution. Mazumdar was arrested in 1972 and died in police custody just three years after the formation of the movement. Later Sanyal gave up the idea of armed uprising and disassociated from the new generation of leaders.

Later Vinod Misra, Nagbhushan Patnaik and Subrat Dutta gave birth to a liberal CPI (ML) and proclaimed their faith in parliamentary democracy.

THE BLACK WIDOWS

The twin bomb attacks in the Moscow metro railway have once again demonstrated that no part of the world is immune to such attacks.

Although no one has claimed responsibility for the attack immediately, the Federal Security Chief, Alexander Bortnikov, was reported to have said that the circumstantial evidence points to the involvement of the Chechen militant groups. Fragments of two female bodies believed to be that of the suicide bombers have been recovered from the sites..

The Russian female suicide bombers known as the Black Widows come from the North Caucus regions. Many of the women in the Chechen region lost their husbands in the two wars against Russia. The Chechen extremists have posed a severe threat to Russia since 1994. Exploiting their anguish the rebels brainwash the women and train them to be suicide bombers.

Sometimes back the leader of the Chechen extremists Umarov had warned Russia that the blood bath would not be confined to the inlands of Chechnya. Big cities such as Russia and St.Petersburg would also have a taste of it he had added.

The Russian Special Forces had killed a prominent extremist leader in early March. It is believed that the twin attacks were carried out in retaliation.

Appearing on the Russian TV, the Russian President Medvedev said that, “We need to focus our attention on certain aspect of improving legislation aimed at preventing terrorist activities”. The president has been reported to have made several proposals to beef up security and ensure the safety of the transport systems.

CHINA,THE LAMA AND KADEER

In a statement issued on 10 March the Dalai Lama explicitly expressed his support to Urighurs in China. Expressing his ‘solidarity’, the Lama said he ‘stands firmly’ with the people of ‘East Turkestan’. Earlier he had a meeting with Rubiya Kadeer the leader-in-exile- of the Urighurs. She lives in the U.S. The coming together of two leaders-in-exile- could cause immense trouble for China.

The envoys of the Lamas had met the representatives of the Chinese government in the last days of January in China. Prior to the meeting The Chinese Communist Party and the Tibet Congress had discussed the Chinese policy towards Tibet in detail.Hu Jintao the Chinese President accused the Lama of trying to incite violence in Tibet. He also declared a developmental plan for the whole of Tibet. Padma Choling was appointed as the governor of TAR.

The Chinese media criticized the Dalai Lama for describing himself as a ‘son of India’. The Lama was not interested in China or even Tibet. He is deliberately misleading the Chinese people to derive political mileage. The media even questioned his religious loyalty. According to it The Lama has forgotten the link between the Tibetan Buddhism and Chinese Buddhism. The Lama’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh was also run down. It wondered how the Lama who described Arunachal Pradesh as a part of India can take care of the interests of Tibet?

The Chinese told the envoys of the Lama that their demands must be within the Chinese Constitution. China made it clear that it is not going to change its policies towards Tibet. China reminded the envoys that the Lama was subject to the Chinese law as the Lamas are recognized since the time of Qings. The Chinese asked the Lama to solve his problems in his life time. It urged the Tibetan people to think about their future after the death of the Lama.

However, the wind seems to have changed direction. The American President Obama, who had earlier declined to meet the Lama, met him. The Americans have also begun making noises about the human rights violations in China. And if the Lama and Kadeer join hands it would cause immense trouble for China.

GIRIJA PRASAD KOIRALA

The death of Girija Prasad Koirala has deprived Nepal of one of its tallest leaders. Though he has not built and nurtured any democratic institutions n Nepal his contributions to democratic process in that country cannot be over looked. Throughout his life he fought against the army, The Maoists, the monarchy and many others who did not want democracy to take root in Nepal.

Koirala came from a politically enlightened family. His father and brother were active in politics. The Ranas ruled Nepal with iron hand. With the help of the colonial Britain they suppressed the Nepali people. His father was exiled and brother put behind the bars for their agitations. India’s struggle for freedom from the British and the Indian national congress inspired the Koiralas much. Their struggle backed by the people bore fruit when Nepal’s first Democratic Government assumed office in 1959. Though the government headed by B.P.Koirala the first Prime Minister of Nepal was short lived, it instilled in the people of Nepal a yearning for democracy.

Unfortunately the Koiralas did not a get a chance to build democratic institutions to safe guard the fledgling democracy. King Mahendra displaced Koirala and captured power. The Koiralas were put behind bars. However, the hold of monarchy on power was weak. Riding on the crest of another movement for democracy G.P. Koirala was able to come back to power in 1991. However, his detractors were more powerful and he lost power again. The political instability that verged on anarchy proved a fertile ground for the radical movement that has now emerged as a power to reckon with. The Maoists.

ELECTIONS IN IRAQ

Many all over the world heaved a sigh of relief as the Iraqi election went off fairly peacefully on March 7. Indeed no one expects the election to solve all the outstanding issues soon. It would take years for democracy to take roots in Iraq which was under authoritarian rule for decades. All the same, the fact that people turned out to vote to elect their ruler is a positive sign indeed. Election results are to be welcomed by all as there has been no report of rigging from any part of the country.

The major political parties in the fray are the State of Law led by the incumbent Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a group led by the anti-American cleric Moqtada al-Sadr and The Iraqi National Alliance and the Iraqi National Movement.

The State of Law of the incumbent Prime Minister who is fighting to hold on to power is facing stiff competition from his powerful opponents. The Iraqi National alliance is the main rival of the Prime Minister. Maliki had talked about the improved law and order situation in the country. However, the recent blasts that shook many cities including Baghdad disprove the claim. His government has not been successful in dealing with the water shortage in the country. He has also failed to fend off the corruption charges against him. Some have even accused him of fostering sectarianism to ensure his hold on the country.

The Iraqi National Alliance the main rival of The State of Law, is made up of Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council and the Sadrists. It enjoys the support of the Shia clerics. In the first election held in Iraq after the removal of Saddam Hussein, al-Maliki was with the United Iraqi Alliance. The alliance later came apart and Maliki joined other political formation. As the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council is close to Iran, victory of the Alliance could cause immense problems for the Americans. The Sadrists have considerable followings as they have carried out developmental works in the cities.

The group the anti-American cleric Moqtada Al-Sadr is leading a real threat to al-Maliki. His rabid anti-Americanism has won him a vast following in the country. Al-Sadr has been campaigning for the ouster of the American army from Iraqi soil.

The Iraqi national Movement is the third contender for power. It is a coalition of secular Sunni and Shia groupings. It is led by a former interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi. Earlier he had connections with the CIA. He has good relations with The Islamic Republic of Iran. The Americans have accused Iran of fomenting troubles in Iraq. Christopher Hill, the American Ambassador to Iraq charged Iran with trying to ‘frustrate the U.S. and Iraqi common goals’.

The Americans want the ‘The State of Law’ in the saddle. The failure of al-Maliki would jeopardize the American interests in the region. The election results would tell the future course of development of the war torn Iraq. Let us hope it will herald a new era in Iraq

TALKS BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN

The bilateral talks between the Foreign Secretaries of India Mrs. Nirupama Rao and her Pakistani counterpart Salman Bashir, in New Delhi on 25 February, did not produce any light. It did not produce any heat either. The talks lasted just three hours. Nirupama Rao told the newsmen that the ‘time is not ripe’ for a composite talk with Pakistan. She described the talks as the ‘first step’ towards building confidence between India and Pakistan.

The bomb blast in Pune on 13 February had cast a shadow over the proposed talks. The Indian government dispelling all doubts declared that the talks would be held as per the schedule. All the same the Cabinet Committee on Security told Nirupama Rao to raise the question during the talks. However, none had expected that the talks would yield any result. New Delhi had declared that its focus would be on the issue of terrorism, especially the terrorist activities emanating from Pakistani soil. The Pakistani side said that it would not allow the issue of terrorism to divert the attention from all the other issues.

Till recently the Indian position was that it would not talk to Pakistan unless the latter take effective and visible action against the perpetrators of the Mumbai terror attack. Indian Home Minister P. Chidambaram said that Pakistan had not done enough to deal with the terrorist activities from Pakistani soil. Many believe that India softened its stand under pressure from The U. S.

After the talks Mr. Salman Bashir said that Islamabad was of the view that the issue of terror should not withhold the two countries from talking to each other. He said Pakistan wanted a ‘result-oriented and meaningful dialogue’ with India. Islamabad wanted to talk about the ‘core issue’ a euphemism for the question of Kashmir. The sharing of the Indus waters has also become a hot issue between India and Pakistan.

India handed over three dossiers to Pakistan. India expects more cooperation from Pakistan in tracking down the terrorists, India believes, hiding in that country India also demanded that Ilyas Kashmiri, a militant who is said to have connection with the Al Qaeda. He had earlier vowed to disrupt the sporting events in India. However, no one believes that Pakistan would act on Indian request. Chidambaram had said the early March that India had provided ample evidence to prove the involvement of Hafiz Saeed in the Mumbai attack. Salman Bashir described the evidence as ‘literature rather than evidence in legal sense’.

As of now, there seems to be no way out of the stalemate between India and Pakistan.

THE AFGHAN SITUATION

The Afghan situation is getting murkier by the day. Now it is said that Karzai’s share of the votes fallen below the required 50%. Karzai’s victory in the general election will force the Americans to adapt their policies and strategies in Afghanistan in such a way as to accommodate Karzai’s concerns.
Americans are not that comfortable working with Karzai ever since he began to assert himself in 2007. Earlier he had no say in the number of NATO forces deployed in his country. As the civilian causalities in the war against the Taliban, mounted and the Afghan people became hostile towards his government he demanded a say in the number and manner of troop deployment. He later insisted on a Status of Force Agreement similar to that of Iraq. Karzai also wanted the international aid agencies not to by pass his government in deciding the quantum of assistance and various developmental activities. Above all, he initiated an intra-Afghan peace process involving the tribal council.
That was unacceptable to the West. For if he succeeded in his attempt then the NATO forces would have to leave the country and the Americans would not be able to herald its own kind of democracy in the region.
The Americans seems to have a two pronged strategy in Afghanistan. According to the US National Security Advisor Mr. James Jones, the ultimate aim of America is “to disrupt, dismantle and prevent the al-Quaeda from being able to operate in its safe havens.” Claiming that additional forces are required to stop the Taliban Obama administration increased the number forces deployed in Afghanistan by fifty percent.
Americans are also aware of the civilian causalities and the hatred it creates in the minds of the Afghan people towards the American presence. General Stanley a MacChrystal, the NATO commander in Afghanistan is reported to have stated, “This is s struggle for the support of the Afghan people. Our willingness to operate in ways that minimize casualties or damage, even when doing so makes our task more difficult, is essential to our credibility”.
Although the intentions are commendable it would call for further deployment of large number of troops in Afghanistan. To dismantle the Taliban fighters from Afghanistan the troops would have to carry out house to house searches. It would take years to complete the process. And it could land Karzai in trouble.
Mr. Richard Hollbrooke, the US President Obama’s special envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan and his team has been preparing a civilian strategy to be introduced in Afghanistan.
Mr. Karzai’s victory would make it difficult for the US to implement its plan. Mr. Karzai has allowed Mr. Dostum, who has been in Turkey and built a formidable coalition comprising mujahideen leaders such as Mohammed Mohaqiq, Mohammed Fahim,and Ismail Khan. Ismail Khan is a friend of Mr. Burhamuddin Rabbani, a former Presidnet of Iran, enemy of the US. Karzai also enjoys the supports of the war lords in the country. In such a context if Karzai wins the election America will find it extremely difficult to control the government in Kabul.

PRAKASH KARAT ON CUBA

The CPI (M) in India still smarting after the drubbing it received in the national elections has been looking around for a ray of hope.
And Prakash Karat, the party’s General Secretary at the national level, has had a revelation. Behold Cuba and emulate her. Cuba is the Socialist Paradise that shines bright amid the Capitalist Wolves.
Cuban Solidarity Committee had organized a Cuba Festival recently in Bangalore to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Glorious Cuban Revolution.
Karat tried his best to cheer up his depressed comrades and the rank and file of the party. One should not lose heart by the electoral reversals, he said. Socialism is marching ahead at the international level in spite of all the capitalist, imperialist conspiracies. You want evidence? Well, look at Cuba, he said.
Cuba! You say in utter disbelief.
According to Comrade Karat, “Cuba has fought the mightiest imperial power and overcome all the difficulties in its way.” (Emphasis added). What an incredible achievement!
Another surprise “Cuba wiped out illiteracy in a year!” In which year was it Comrade Karat? (Emphasis added). Ashamed that I was not aware of such a great feat by Cuba I asked my colleagues and friends. They and I realized how ignorant we have been all these years. None of us had heard about Cuba wiping out illiteracy in a year. The ratio between doctor and patient is 1:1000000, which is also superior to that of developed countries. What about development? Cuba has scaled great heights in development also. It is far ahead of other countries.
Comrade Karat went on to say that “It is not only a symbol of internationalism and resistance to imperialism, but also a source of inspiration for all countries which were under colonialism and imperialistic exploitation”.
All this nonsense in 2009. Twenty years after the collapse of the Berlin Wall and reunification of Germany. And the break up of the USSR, said to have been created by one of their oracles, Lenin after the Glorious October Revolution in 1917.
Do not think that you can talk with the Marxists and try to convince them that all talk about the paradise on earth is meaningless. They just cannot get rid of their ideological blinkers and take a look at the course of history. They still firmly believe that they have a Grand Scientific Theory with which they can read the past and predict the future. And it has not failed them at any point in time.
Listen to what Karat said “Many of our friends and critics told us to give up the fight against imperialism because it has become irrelevant in the 21st century. If we do that, we cease to be what we are; we cease to be a force for progressive change and that lesson we must learn from Cuba”.
(In a conversation Mr. Anil Tandon of Doordarsan had with Mr. Sitaram Yechoori, Rajya Sabha member and a theoretician of the CPI (M) on Doordarsan channel, Tandon asked Yechoori to comment on an old joke that the CPI (M) is confined to just four places, West Bengal, Kerala, Tripura and Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi. Yechoori seemed to admit it gracefully while saying that it is to be looked into.)

MUHAMMD ALI JINNAH

Retrospection and introspection are expected to yield come concrete results. They often bring to light what was hidden or unknown to light. Reassessment of individuals and movements helps us to learn from our past mistakes and move ahead.
An assessment of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, widely known as the Father of Pakistan is worth ones while. However, unlike any other political figure Jinnah is one of the most complicated both as an individual and a political leader. Both Jinnah and Gandhiji came from Gujarat. While Jinnah spoke little Gujarati, Gandhiji spoke and wrote in Gujarati. Both of them were also trained lawyers. They studied law in England. While Gandhiji claimed to represent millions of ordinary people Jinnah said time and again that Gandhiji represented the Hindus alone. And he wanted to be the ‘Sole Spokesman of the Muslims’.
The Sole Spokesman of the Muslims spoke little Urdu. He did not take the trouble to learn it. But he claimed that there was a concerted effort to wipe out the language. He was a chain smoker. He enjoyed his pork, something a devout Muslim considers to be the abode of the devil. He did not say his prayers five times a day as a devout Muslim is supposed to do. He is reported to have touched the Holy Quran the sacred text of the Muslims only once. But he wanted to be recognized as the sole representative of the Muslim community.
It is also reported that his driver was a Sikh from the Punjab, his stenographer a Brahmin from Kerala, his cook a Hindu from Goa. He fell in love with a Parsi woman and married her. However, he objected when his daughter, his only child, fell in love with a Parsi and married him. He went to Pakistan alone. His daughter stayed back in India.
He never kept a diary or authored any book.
When Bal Gangadhar Tilak was accused of being anti national by the British, Jinnah tried his best to save him. Gopal Krishna Goghale thought that Jinnah was free from all sectarian prejudice and had all the qualities that would make him the best ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity. Sarojini Naidu, the nightingale of India said, Jinnah,“whose fair ambition it is to become the Muslim Goghale may in some glorious and terrible crisis of our national struggle pass into immortality as the Mazzini of the Indian Liberation”.
The same Jinnah also said, “The Mussalmans are not a minority, as it is commonly known and understood…. Mussalmans are a nation by any definition of a nation, and the must have their homelands, their territory and their state.” (Pirzada II, Pa337)
As neither Gandhiji nor the Congress regarded Jinnah as the sole spokesman of the Muslims, he said, “Why does not Mr. Gandhi agree-and I have suggested this to him more than once, and I repeat it again from this platform-why does not Mr. Gandhi honestly now acknowledge that the Congress is a Hindu Congress, that he does not represent anybody except the solid body of a Hindu people? Why should not Mr. Gandhi be proud to say, ‘I am a Hindu, the Congress had solid Hindu bcking?’ I am not ashamed of saying that I am a Mussalman. I am right I hope, and I think even a blind man must have been convinced by now,that the Muslim League has the solid backing of the Mussalmans of India. Why then all this camouflage? Why all these machinisations? Why not come as a Hindu leader proudly representing your people and let me meet you proudly representing the Mussalmas…” (Pirzada 2, pa 333)
The fact that Mahatma Gandhi alone was the person who always opposed partition is also known widely. Pyarelal, his secretary and biographer has noted Gandhiji as having said , “The purity of my striving will be put to test only now. Today I find myself all alone. Even the Sardar and Jawaharlal think that my reading of the situation is wrong and peace is sure to return if partition is agreed upon…..They do not like my telling the Viceroy that even if there is to be partition, it should not be through the British intervention or under the British Rule…. They wonder if I have not deteriorated with age….Nevertheless I must speak as I feel I am to be a true and loyal friend to the Congress and to the British people, as I claim to be…regardless of whether my advice is heeded or not. I see clearly that we are setting about this business the wrong way. We may not feel the full effect immediately, but I can see clearly that the future of Independence gained at this price is going to be dark. I pray that god may not keep me alive to witness it...” (Pyarelal, The Last Phase, vol II 200) Mahatma’s words are plain enough.
Nehru himself has admitted as much later.
Ayesha Jalal Pakistani scholar and historian in her The Sole Spokesman, says that actually Jinnah did not want the partition. And the demand for Pakistan was just a bargaining chip. Although many have hailed it as a scholarly work it did not find her arguments convincing.
What has Jaswant got to say about Jinnah? He says that Jinnah has been demonized in India. In an interview with Karan Thapar broadcast by CNN-IBN, Jaswant commented that, “a distinction has to be made between Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s personal attributes as a human being and his politics. The personal attributes are admirable. His equations with human beings of all communities were a real example. His politics were abhorable. Particularly after 1940”. What is one to make of it?
Karan: - you said India has demonized him and yet you completely overlooked and ignored the fat that he launched against India the first threat to Indian sovereignty and the first war that India faced. And he did it within three months of partition. That is not mentioned.
Jaswant: - That would have required altogether a different and a separate book. Already it was running to 900 pages. The book had to be cut down. There are limits to it.
Karan: - What happens if people turn around and say that by overlooking and ignoring this, you have not only written a one-sided account but you have exculpated Jinnah of the charge of launching war against India?
Jaswant: - I have not exculpated because among the first of the sentences that I used in this interview is that a distinction has to be made between his personal attributes and his public conduct. These are two very different things”.
Is he going to write a sequel to his biography of Jinnah that runs to 669 pages?
Are we to wait and watch?

PAKISTAN'S PREVARICATIONS

The fact that Pakistan is the epicenter of terrorist activities in the region is an open secret. It is also known to everyone that Pakistan and its ISI were behind the attack on the Taj hotel in Mumbai. Indian and American investigators have gathered ample evidence to prove their involvement. American government also pressed Pakistan to bring the perpetrators and the organizations to book.
And Pakistan has on its part assured India and America to punish them the moment they are found out. India has handed over the details of many of the terrorists involved in the attack. One of the persons, Kasab who took part in the dastardly attack has been taken into custody. He has agreed that he and his associates came from Pakistan. His father in Pakistan recognized his son and admitted that Kasab was his son. For long authorities in Pakistan refused to admit the obvious and kept saying that Kasb or the killed terrorists were not Pakistani nationals. It refused to accept the dead bodies of those killed in the commando operation by India saying that there was no evidence to show that they were Pakistan citizens.
Under severe pressure from the US Pakistan later admitted that Kasb and all the killed terrorists were Pakistani citizens. Pakistan requested India to hand over the list of persons India claimed it had with it and all the evidences India had gathered to trace the terrorists hiding in Pakistan and bring them to justice.
Though Pakistan arrested Hafiz Saeed, chief of Jamaat-ud-Dawa, when the UN proscribed the outfit for alleged involvement in the Mumbai attack, the Lahore High Court set him free saying that there was no evidence to link him to the Mumbai attacks. On 1 August 2009, India handed over a seven page document with annexure to Pakistan which, Mr. Chidambaram India’s Home Minister claimed contained some more evidence showing the involvement of Saeed. Pakistan could find answers to its questions in the documents if they took the trouble to read it, the minister added.
When Mr. Manmohan Singh met Zardari, Pakistan’s president immediately after Singh’s re-election as the Prime Minister of India, he told bluntly in front of the international media that the renewed mandate just allowed him to tell the president that he was supposed to take concrete action against the terrorists operating from the Pakistani soil.
On 15 April 2009, while talking to the Editor’s Guild Mr. Singh said “There won’t be any resumption of bilateral talks till Islamabad stops allowing terrorists to use its territory against India”.
But on 16 July 2009, Singh signed a joint declaration with his Pakistani counterpart Mr. Gilani that read, “India was ready to discuss all issues with Pakistan, including all outstanding issues”. Not only had that Sing also expressed India’s concerns about the situations in Balochistan. It was a grave error on the part of the Indian Prime Minister. It gave the Pakistani Prime Minister a chance to state “the joined statement signed by me and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh underlines our concerns over India’s interference in Balochistan and other areas”.
As it led to uproar in India and the opposition accused Singh of de linking bilateral talks and terrorism Singh said in the parliament that India would not talk to Pakistan until it took concrete actions against the terrorists.
On 29 August Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Mr. Shah Mohammed Qureshi said at a news conference in Islamabad that “India hesitates on meaningful dialogue but they want cooperation in probing the Mumbai attacks. They want progress and then they shy away from talks. Both things cannot go together”. He further said that if the bilateral talks were not resumed soon the terrorists would determine the future course of events”.
India has responded saying that there was no point in talking now. Now that we have made it clear that we would not talk with Pakistan we must stick to it. There is no point in handing over any more evidence to Pakistan. It will keep asking for more evidence. It knows and every one around the world knows that the terrorists came from Pakistan and that they had been trained in Pakistan. But it is certain that Pakistan is not going to take any action as it is obvious that India would not take any military action against it.